Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Are gains in emotional symptoms and emotion-regulation competencies after the REThink therapeutic game maintained in the long run? A 6-month follow-up

  • Original Contribution
  • Published:
European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Emotional disorders are the most prevalent mental health conditions affecting children and adolescents. Thus, it becomes essential to develop and test early intervention strategies that are accessible, attractive, and can effectively improve their emotional functioning. A randomized control trial compared the prevention effects of the REThink therapeutic game to those of a standard face-to-face prevention program, and a waitlist which was transformed at follow-up into care as usual. Out of 142 healthy children and adolescents who completed the intervention stage, 137 (mean age: 12.84, SD: 1.97) completed a follow-up assessment measuring emotional symptoms, depressive mood and emotion regulation. We also tested potential moderators of its long-term effects, such as parental psychological control, parent attachment and childhood trauma. Our results highlighted the fact that the REThink intervention had a durable impact on the children’s mental health and their ability to regulate their emotions. Moreover, we found that trauma, parent psychological control and parent attachment moderated the maintenance of the improvements. Future research needs to further document how to personalize the game and prevention program components to better address the characteristics of the youths at risk for mental health problems. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03308981, from 13.10.2017.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, upon reasonable request.

Code availability

Not applicable.

References

  1. WHO Regional Office for Europe (2018): Factsheet for World Mental Health Day 2018. In: WHO. https://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0005/383891/adolescent-mh-fseng.pdf. Accessed 23 July 2021

  2. David OA, Costescu C, Cardos R, Mogoaşe C (2020) How effective are serious games for promoting mental health and health behavioral change in children and adolescents? a systematic review and meta-analysis. Child Youth Care Forum 49(6):817–838. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10566-020-09566-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Merry SN, Stasiak K, Shepherd M, Frampton C, Fleming T, Lucassen MFG (2012) The effectiveness of SPARX, a computerised self help intervention for adolescents seeking help for depression: randomised controlled non-inferiority trial. BMJ 344:e2598. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e2598

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Ellis A (1994) Reason and emotion in psychotherapy. Birch Lane, Secaucus

    Google Scholar 

  5. David OA, Predatu RM, Cardoș RAI (2018) A pilot study of the REThink online video game applied for coaching emotional understanding in children and adolescents in the therapeutic video game environment: the feeling better resources game. J Evid-Based Psychother 18(1):57–67. https://doi.org/10.24193/jebp.2018.1.5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. David OA, Cardoș RAI, Matu S (2019) Is REThink therapeutic game effective in preventing emotional disorders in children and adolescents? Outcomes of a randomized clinical trial. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 28(1):111–122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-018-1192-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. David O, Cardos RAI, Matu S (2019) Changes in irrational beliefs are responsible for the efficacy of the REThink therapeutic game in preventing emotional disorders in children and adolescents: Mechanisms of change analysis of a randomized clinical trial. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-018-1195-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. David OA, Predatu R, Maffei A (2020) REThink online video game for children and adolescents: effects on state anxiety and frontal alpha asymmetry. Int J Cogn Ther 14(2):399–416. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41811-020-00077-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. David OA, Predatu R, Cardoș RAI (2021) Effectiveness of the REThink therapeutic online video game in promoting mental health in children and adolescents. Internet Interv 25:100391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.invent.2021.100391

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Yap MBH, Pilkington PD, Ryan SM, Jorm AF (2014) Parental factors associated with depression and anxiety in young people: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Affect Disord 156:8–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2013.11.007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Twisk JWR (2013) Applied longitudinal data analysis for epidemiology: a practical guide, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139342834

    Book  Google Scholar 

  12. Vernon A (1998) The PASSPORT program: A journey through emotional, social, cognitive, and self-development, grades 9–12. Research Press, pp. xiii, 27

  13. Goodman R (1997) The strengths and difficulties questionnaire: a research note. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 38(5):581–586. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1997.tb01545.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Goodman R, Meltzer H, Bailey V (1998) The strengths and difficulties questionnaire: A pilot study on the validity of the self-report version. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 7(3):125–130. https://doi.org/10.1007/s007870050057

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. MacDermott ST, Gullone E, Allen JS, King NJ, Tonge B (2010) The Emotion Regulation Index for Children and Adolescents (ERICA): a psychometric investigation. J Psychopathol Behav Assess 32(3):301–314. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-009-9154-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hughes EK, Gullone E, Watson SD (2011) Emotional functioning in children and adolescents with elevated depressive symptoms. J Psychopathol Behav Assess 33(3):335–345. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-011-9220-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ellis, L. K. (2002). Individual Differences and Adolescent Psychosocial Development. https://scholarsbank.uoregon.edu/xmlui/handle/1794/26008

  18. Ellis L, Rothbart M (2001) Revision of the early adolescent temperament questionnaire. Poster Present Biennal Meete Soc Res Child Dev. https://doi.org/10.1037/t07624-000

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Neamtu GM, David OA (2016) Coaching emotional abilities in fostered adolescents through rational emotive and cognitive-behavioral education: efficacy and mechanisms of change of using therapeutic stories. J Evid-Based Psychother 16(1):33–56

    Google Scholar 

  20. Barber BK (1996) Parental psychological control: revisiting a neglected construct. Child Dev 67(6):3296–3319. https://doi.org/10.2307/1131780

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Gullone E, Robinson K (2005) The inventory of parent and peer attachment-revised (IPPA-R) for children: a psychometric investigation. Clin Psychol Psychother 12(1):67–79. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpp.433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Armsden GC, Greenberg MT (1987) The inventory of parent and peer attachment: Individual differences and their relationship to psychological well-being in adolescence. J Youth Adolesc 16(5):427–454. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02202939

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Sachser C, Berliner L, Holt T, Jensen TK, Jungbluth N, Risch E, Rosner R, Goldbeck L (2017) International development and psychometric properties of the Child and Adolescent Trauma Screen (CATS). J Affect Disord 210:189–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2016.12.040

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Rausch JR, Maxwell SE, Kelley K (2003) Analytic methods for questions pertaining to a randomized pretest, posttest, follow-up design: the Official Journal for the Society of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology. Am Psychol Assoc 32(3):467–486. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15374424JCCP3203_15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Comer JS, Kendall PC (eds) (2013) The Oxford handbook of research strategies for clinical psychology. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 459–xvi. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199793549.001.0001

    Book  Google Scholar 

  26. Lord FM (1967) A paradox in the interpretation of group comparisons. Psychol Bull 68(5):304–305. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0025105

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Kim H-Y (2015) Statistical notes for clinical researchers: Post-hoc multiple comparisons. Restor Dent Endod 40(2):172–176. https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2015.40.2.172

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Goss-Sampson MA (2018) Statistical analysis in JASP: a guide for students. version 2, October 2018.

  29. JASP Team (2021). JASP (version 0.14.3) [computer software].

  30. Corp IBM (2019) Released 2019. IBM SPSS statistics for windows, Version 260. IBM Corp, Armonk

    Google Scholar 

  31. Zayeni D, Raynaud J-P, Revet A (2020) Therapeutic and preventive use of video games in child and adolescent psychiatry: a systematic review. Front Psych. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. David OA, Magurean S, Tomoiagă C (2022) Do improvements in therapeutic game-based skills transfer to real life improvements in children's emotion-regulation abilities and mental health? A pilot study that offers preliminary validity ofthe REThink in-game performance scoring. Frontiers in Psychiatry 13:828. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2022.828481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. David OA (2019) The rational parenting coach app: Rethink parenting! A mobile parenting program for offering evidence-based personalized support in the prevention of child externalizing and internalizing disorders. J Evid Based Psychother 19(2):97–108

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by two grants awarded to Oana A. David from the Romanian National Authority for Scientific Research, CNCS-UEFISCDI [grant numbers PN-II-PT-PCCA2013-4–1937 and PN-III-P2-2.1-PED-2019–3837].

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Oana A. David.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

Ethical approval for the study was obtained from the Institutional Review Board at the author’s affiliated institution.

Informed consent to participate/to publish

Informed consent (including the processing of personal data according to EU regulations) to participate/to publish was obtained from the participants’ parents and from the school principal.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

David, O.A., Fodor, L.A. Are gains in emotional symptoms and emotion-regulation competencies after the REThink therapeutic game maintained in the long run? A 6-month follow-up. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 32, 1853–1862 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-022-02002-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-022-02002-w

Keywords

Navigation