Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Earthquake readiness in volatile regions: the case of Israel

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Natural Hazards Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Jordan Rift Valley is a high-risk low-occurrence zone for earthquakes, with documented incidences within the last millennium causing widespread destruction. This research examines the implications of the immediate risks for earthquake readiness. Due to data availability, we focus on Israel’s readiness for earthquakes and compare our findings with a cursory review of readiness in the proximate countries. Readiness refers to mitigation and preparedness (before), response (during) and recovery (after). The immediate and palpable threats in the region are wars and terrorism, and our hypothesis is that governance culture in this volatile region is geared toward capacities and expertise which have been developed to address national security threats, characterized by emphasis on quick response. We expect to see a bias toward immediate response with regard to earthquake readiness as well, with attention also paid to preparedness. Accordingly, we hypothesize that other aspects of readiness, such as retrofitting of buildings and infrastructure in the mitigation category, lag behind in countries surrounding the Jordan Rift. To test this, we develop and apply a regulatory system scan and assessment methodology to the Israeli case. The methodology includes structured mapping and evaluation of the relevant regulatory system as well as actual policy outputs. The process includes inputs from policy makers, experts, and stakeholders. Findings show that the country’s earthquake readiness regime is indeed heavily biased toward immediate response which is continually advancing and improving, managed by security-related bodies. In contrast, mitigation efforts are deficient and little is being done to improve the situation. A survey of readiness efforts of other countries along the Jordan Rift points to a similar situation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Source: Kurzon and Wetzler (2015)

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Definitions from: FEMA (2002), see also The National Academies (2012) and SAGE (2012).

  2. Shmueli et al. (2018, p. 83) provide the following definitions: disruptive friction occurs de jure when more than one governmental unit has the legal power to control a particular matter pursuant to purposes that may be in tension with the other, and de facto when one governmental unit uses its power (as a regulator or an actor) in ways that do not align with the regulation or action of another governmental unit (or of itself). From the perspective of those subject to regulation, disruptive friction occurs when the state legal apparatus or its actions generate diverging instructions, criteria or procedures to be followed. Such friction among governmental agencies may lead to vague or unclear regulation (as general standards may be resorted to in order to address the concerns of the various state agencies involved), leading to sub-optimal or 'checkered' regulation, addressing some matters but not others as a result of ad hoc compromises among the various governmental entities.

    Gaps exist when a social challenge is not within the legal purview of any governmental unit, when the legal framework is incomplete, or when the regulatory powers are not used, or used in a manner that falls significantly short of achieving the purpose for which the governmental units were granted legal powers.

  3. The map (in Hebrew) is available at https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B5dLxu7Spgj1cXFVdHNBZ2tBaGM/view?usp=sharing.

  4. The Yemini civil war broke out in 2015 and since then there is no effective government.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was undertaken at the Minerva Center for the Rule of Law under Extreme Conditions and funded by the Israeli Ministry of Science and Technology.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Deborah F. Shmueli.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shmueli, D.F., Segal, E., Ben Gal, M. et al. Earthquake readiness in volatile regions: the case of Israel. Nat Hazards 98, 405–423 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-019-03698-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-019-03698-x

Keywords

Navigation