Diversity and evolution of actin-dependent phenotypes

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gde.2019.07.016Get rights and content

The actin cytoskeleton governs a vast array of core eukaryotic phenotypes that include cell movement, endocytosis, vesicular trafficking, and cytokinesis. Although the basic principle underlying these processes is strikingly simple — actin monomers polymerize into filaments that can depolymerize back into monomers — eukaryotic cells have sophisticated and layered control systems to regulate actin dynamics. The evolutionary origin of these complex systems is an area of active research. Here, we review the regulation and diversity of actin networks to provide a conceptual framework for cell biologists interested in evolution and for evolutionary biologists interested in actin-dependent phenotypes.

Section snippets

Complex regulation underlies actin phenotype diversity

Actin is among the most abundant proteins in eukaryotic cells and is often maintained at concentrations in excess of 200 μM [1]. At such high concentrations, actin monomers readily assemble into dynamic polymers. To avoid becoming a solid brick of polymerized actin, a cell must maintain tight control over its actin monomer pool (Figure 1). This control is mediated by a dizzying and ever-growing list of molecular regulators, including monomer-binding proteins that suppress spontaneous actin

The pre-eukaryotic origins of actin

The ubiquity of phenotypes that are controlled by actin raises a seemingly simple question: ‘Where did actin come from?’ The discovery of actin structural homologs in bacteria, and more recently in archaea, indicates that actin-like polymers are used by cells across the tree of life. These proteins are commonly referred to as ‘actins’ despite no obvious sequence homology to eukaryotic actin, raising the possibility that this term may carry eukaryotic connotations that are misleading.

The genetic

Tracing the evolution of complex actin networks

Actin coordinates almost all cellular activities, and homologs of its major regulators have been identified in nearly every eukaryotic species. Phylogenetic analyses indicate that profilin [44], formins [45,46], the Arp2/3 complex and its upstream activators [47,48], major classes of myosin motors [49], and various other actin regulators were most likely present in the genome of the last common eukaryotic ancestor. However, the presence of an individual actin binding protein does not tell much

Leveraging eukaryotic diversity to understand actin cytoskeletal phenotypes

A major bottleneck to understanding actin-dependent phenotypes is the complexity of the actin cytoskeleton at every level (Figure 1). At the sequence level, eukaryotes often have multiple actin isoforms. At the structural level, actin functions both as a monomer and as a polymer with diverse network architectures, with each network controlled by a wide variety of regulators. At the cellular level, actin monomers and networks interface with nearly every other cell system, particularly membranes,

Moving forward: using discovery-based science to shed light on ‘dark’ actin biology

Most of what we know about actin comes from studying a handful of genetically tractable species, most of which belong to a single major eukaryotic group: the opisthokonts. This group encompasses animals, fungi, and related organisms, leaving entire major eukaryotic groups with nearly no experimental data, especially regarding the actin cytoskeleton (Figure 4b). Because of the massive numbers of genes gained and lost by major eukaryotic groups [71], there undoubtedly remain important and

Outlook and conclusions

The broad conservation of actin and actin binding proteins highlights their importance to cell biology. Much of our understanding of the evolution of the behaviors encoded by actin networks, however, relies on the assumption that their biochemistry, network properties, and higher-level phenotypes are all conserved. Given the billions of years of evolution separating the major eukaryotic lineages, it is almost certain that actin-dependent phenotypes have diverged at least to some level. A

Conflict of interest statement

Nothing declared.

References and recommended reading

Papers of particular interest, published within the period of review, have been highlighted as:

  • • of special interest

  • •• of outstanding interest

Acknowledgements

We thank Alison Wirshing (Brandeis University), Samantha Dundon (Yale), Alexander Paredez (University of Washington), Evan Craig (University of Kansas Medical Center), Aoife Heaslip (University of Connecticut), Michelle Facette (University of Massachusetts, Amherst), Qiong Nan (University of Massachusetts, Amherst), and Clinton Parraga (University of Connecticut) for providing images. We also thank Kenneth Campellone (University of Connecticut), Alison Wirshing, Bruce Goode (Brandeis

References (84)

  • A.C. Gingras et al.

    Getting to know the neighborhood: using proximity-dependent biotinylation to characterize protein complexes and map organelles

    Curr Opin Chem Biol

    (2019)
  • A.R. Wagner et al.

    Dip1 defines a class of Arp2/3 complex activators that function without preformed actin filaments

    Curr Biol

    (2013)
  • M.E. Quinlan et al.

    Drosophila Spire is an actin nucleation factor

    Nature

    (2005)
  • G. Rebowski et al.

    X-ray scattering study of actin polymerization nuclei assembled by tandem W domains

    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A

    (2008)
  • M.E. Quinlan et al.

    Regulatory interactions between two actin nucleators, Spire and Cappuccino

    J Cell Biol

    (2007)
  • T.D. Pollard et al.

    Molecular mechanisms controlling actin filament dynamics in nonmuscle cells

    Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct

    (2000)
  • M.F. Carlier et al.

    Global treadmilling coordinates actin turnover and controls the size of actin networks

    Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol

    (2017)
  • K. Skruber et al.

    Reconsidering an active role for G-actin in cytoskeletal regulation

    J Cell Sci

    (2018)
  • K.G. Campellone et al.

    A nucleator arms race: cellular control of actin assembly

    Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol

    (2010)
  • K. Rottner et al.

    How distinct Arp2/3 complex variants regulate actin filament assembly

    Nat Cell Biol

    (2016)
  • N. Molinie et al.

    Cortical branched actin determines cell cycle progression

    Cell Res

    (2019)
  • J.V. Abella et al.

    Isoform diversity in the Arp2/3 complex determines actin filament dynamics

    Nat Cell Biol

    (2016)
  • R. Dominguez

    The WH2 domain and actin nucleation: necessary but insufficient

    Trends Biochem Sci

    (2016)
  • P. Montaville et al.

    Spire and Formin 2 synergize and antagonize in regulating actin assembly in meiosis by a ping-pong mechanism

    PLoS Biol

    (2014)
  • F. Kage et al.

    FMNL formins boost lamellipodial force generation

    Nat Commun

    (2017)
  • J.D. Rotty et al.

    Profilin-1 serves as a gatekeeper for actin assembly by Arp2/3-dependent and -independent pathways

    Dev Cell

    (2015)
  • C. Suarez et al.

    Profilin regulates F-actin network homeostasis by favoring formin over Arp2/3 complex

    Dev Cell

    (2015)
  • Mu A et al.

    A complex containing lysine-acetylated actin inhibits the formin INF2

    Nat Cell Biol

    (2019)
  • R.D. Mullins et al.

    From solution to surface to filament: actin flux into branched networks

    Biophys Rev

    (2018)
  • C.P. Caridi et al.

    Nuclear F-actin and myosins drive relocalization of heterochromatic breaks

    Nature

    (2018)
  • C. Bajusz et al.

    Nuclear actin: ancient clue to evolution in eukaryotes?

    Histochem Cell Biol

    (2018)
  • P.R. Stoddard et al.

    Evolution of polymer formation within the actin superfamily

    Mol Biol Cell

    (2017)
  • J. Wagstaff et al.

    Prokaryotic cytoskeletons: protein filaments organizing small cells

    Nat Rev Microbiol

    (2018)
  • S.G. Addinall et al.

    FtsA is localized to the septum in an FtsZ-dependent manner

    J Bacteriol

    (1996)
  • R.B. Jensen et al.

    Partitioning of plasmid R1. The ParM protein exhibits ATPase activity and interacts with the centromere-like ParR-parC complex

    J Mol Biol

    (1997)
  • A. Komeili et al.

    Magnetosomes are cell membrane invaginations organized by the actin-like protein MamK

    Science

    (2006)
  • S. Hussain et al.

    MreB filaments align along greatest principal membrane curvature to orient cell wall synthesis

    eLife

    (2018)
  • M. Doi et al.

    Determinations of the DNA sequence of the mreB gene and of the gene products of the mre region that function in formation of the rod shape of Escherichia coli cells

    J Bacteriol

    (1988)
  • R.L. Lamason et al.

    Actin-based motility and cell-to-cell spread of bacterial pathogens

    Curr Opin Microbiol

    (2017)
  • D. Truong et al.

    Bacterial subversion of host cytoskeletal machinery: hijacking formins and the Arp2/3 complex

    Bioessays

    (2014)
  • M.D. Welch et al.

    Arp2/3-mediated actin-based motility: a tail of pathogen abuse

    Cell Host Microbe

    (2013)
  • M.D. Welch et al.

    Interaction of human Arp2/3 complex and the Listeria monocytogenes ActA protein in actin filament nucleation

    Science

    (1998)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text