Converting a graduate-level course into a HyFlex modality: What are effective engagement strategies?
Introduction
According to a recent survey (Donovan et al., 2019), the proportion of Canadian higher education institutions offering online and blended courses has respectively grown to 83% and 78% in 2018, and is presumed to expand further in the future. Benefitting from the rapid evolution of information and communication technologies (ICT), these course modalities derive their popularity from their flexibility in terms of time and/or space, allowing students to better balance academic, personal and professional responsibilities, especially at the graduate level (Abdelmalak & Parra, 2016; Lakhal & Khechine, 2017; Taylor et al., 2018). Online and blended course modalities are also very popular in business faculties (Arbaugh, 2014; Kumar et al., 2019; Popovich & Neel, 2005; Wolverton, 2018). In particular, most Masters in Business Administration (MBA) in Laval University (Quebec, Canada), in which this study was conducted, are offered through online and blended modalities to accommodate the diverse needs of students.
Laval University is a multimodal university offering more than a thousand online courses in addition to blended and face-to-face courses. In 2018–2019, alternative course modalities (traditional blended, HyFlex and online) accounted for 26% of total student credits, with a more than 40% increase in the last four years. In particular, the Faculty of Business Administration (FSA ULaval) has developed a leadership position in online and blended learning, offering such courses since 1997 with the expertise and investment of a dedicated team of learning technologists and instructional designers. The development of alternative course modalities is also a component of the faculty strategic plan to facilitate balance between students’ academic, personal and professional responsibilities.
Learning outcomes in online or blended courses are considered equivalent to those of face-to-face courses (Arbaugh, 2014, 2016; Kumar et al., 2019; Popovich & Neel, 2005). However, online (often asynchronous) courses have some major drawbacks, such as high dropout rates and students’ feelings of isolation (Angelino et al., 2007; Bolliger & Martindale, 2004; Kranzow, 2013), which could be associated with a lack of instructor support resulting in lower student satisfaction than in face-to-face courses (Bolliger & Martindale, 2004; Mullen & Tallent-Runnels, 2006). In contrast, blended courses preserve synchronous student-student and student-instructor interactions and yield higher student satisfaction than face-to-face or online asynchronous courses (Owston et al., 2013). While a “traditional” blended course usually refers to a combination of face-to-face and online asynchronous teaching and learning (T&L) activities (Garrison & Kanuka, 2004; Garrison & Vaughan, 2008), new blended modalities have also emerged during the last ten years, whether for cost-optimization purposes or to increase the flexibility and accessibility of higher education for students. These new modalities, labelled blended online (Power, 2008), blended synchronous (Lakhal et al., 2017, 2020), synchromodal (Bell et al., 2014), multi-access (Irvine, 2009; Irvine et al., 2013) or HyFlex (Beatty, 2007, 2019) courses, replace face-to-face sessions with online synchronous sessions for some or all students. Specifically, HyFlex courses combine online asynchronous T&L activities with “flexible-synchronous” T&L activities where students can choose to attend online synchronously, face-to-face, or online asynchronously through recordings and videos. In business faculties, this emerging course modality could be particularly well-suited for MBA students, who often have very diverse backgrounds and needs.
Out of a total of 583 courses at FSA ULaval in 2019, 157 were online (mostly asynchronous), 67 were traditional blended and 43 were HyFlex courses. In keeping with the assumption that one size does not fit all, numerous courses are offered through multiple sections and modalities that enable students to enroll in the one best fitting their styles or needs. At the graduate level, especially, alternative course modalities at FSA ULaval made up 45% of total courses in 2019. In a context where 71.5% of graduate students were registered part-time in 2019, offering almost half of courses in online, traditional blended or HyFlex modalities helps students to balance studies with their work and family responsibilities. Particularly, a growing percentage of courses are now offered in a HyFlex modality given its large flexibility of participation and regular opportunities for interaction with the instructor and other students, especially at the graduate level. This study monitored the transformation of blended and online sections of a graduate level course in operations management into a HyFlex modality at FSA ULaval.
Section snippets
Problem
An increasing number of courses are delivered in multiple course sections and modalities, enabling students to enroll in the one fitting their needs and preferences. However, offering the same course in multiple modalities raises an additional challenge of providing equivalent T&L activities to all students. On the one hand, students in face-to-face (or traditional blended courses) have multiple opportunities to interact with the instructor and other students, but they may expect the instructor
HyFlex courses
The term HyFlex was first introduced by Beatty (2007, 2014) as a combination of Hybrid (i.e., traditional blended in this study) and Flexible (i.e., students’ choice of attendance). Beatty (2007) proposed to build a HyFlex course on four main principles: (i) learner choice, (ii) equivalency, (iii) reusability and (iv) accessibility. The first, learner choice, consists of enabling students to choose a participation mode (face-to-face, online synchronous or online asynchronous) throughout the
Course transformation
The Operations course consists of an introduction to the diverse qualitative and quantitative aspects of operations management, e.g., forecasting, project management, waiting lines analysis, quality management, sales and operations planning, inventory management and material requirement planning. Compulsory in most graduate level programs (M.B.A. or M.Sc.), it welcomes 350 students per year, approximatively, in four distinct course sections. A face-to-face course section is offered in the Fall
Research question 1: According to students’ perceptions, what components of a HyFlex course modality are related to student engagement?
At stage 1, students were asked to identify components of the new course design having an influence on student engagement (Table 1) and to provide additional comments on the identified links. First, the results suggested that the weekly HyFlex sessions have a considerable influence on student behavioral engagement, followed by emotional engagement and cognitive engagement in the course. Students also suggested that the course organization supported their continuous behavioral engagement in the
Discussion
This study explored students' perceptions about a HyFlex modality in relation to student engagement. Both qualitative and quantitative data were collected through questionnaires for two consecutive years. It adds to the sparse literature about student engagement in blended or HyFlex modalities (Taylor et al., 2019). This study brings a new perspective by highlighting strategies to foster student engagement in a HyFlex course. First, components of the new HyFlex modality that were related to
Conclusion
Following the transformation of online and blended sections of a graduate level course in operations management into a HyFlex modality over two consecutive years, this study investigated student engagement and effective engagement strategies in the HyFlex course. Exploratory qualitative data collected at year 1 suggested that the course organization with weekly flexible-synchronous activities, which included regular opportunities for interaction and were video-recorded, fostered student
CRediT authorship contribution statement
Géraldine Heilporn: Conceptualization, Methodology, Investigation, Formal analysis, Writing – original draft. Sawsen Lakhal: Validation, of all stages of the research study, Writing – review & editing.
Declaration of competing interest
None.
Acknowledgments
We thank the two anonymous reviewers for their constructive and useful comments, which helped improve the quality of published work.
References (85)
- et al.
Design and implementation factors in blended synchronous learning environments: Outcomes from a cross-case analysis
Computers & Education
(2015) The effectiveness of m-learning in the form of podcast revision lectures in higher education
Computers & Education
(2008)- et al.
Student engagement, context, and adjustment: Addressing definitional, measurement, and methodological issues
Learning and Instruction
(2016) - et al.
Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education
The Internet and Higher Education
(2004) - et al.
A thematic analysis of the most highly cited scholarship in the first decade of blended learning research
The Internet and Higher Education
(2014) - et al.
Measuring student engagement in technology-mediated learning: A review
Computers & Education
(2015) - et al.
Online business education research: Systematic analysis and a conceptual model
International Journal of Management in Education
(2019) - et al.
Student intention to use desktop web-conferencing according to course delivery modes in higher education
International Journal of Management in Education
(2016) - et al.
Investigating student engagement in blended learning settings using experience sampling and structural equation modeling
The Internet and Higher Education
(2017) - et al.
Student outcomes and perceptions of instructors' demands and support in online and traditional classrooms
The Internet and Higher Education
(2006)
Student perceptions and achievement in a university blended learning strategic initiative
The Internet and Higher Education
Utilizing synchronous discussions to create an engaged classroom in online executive education
International Journal of Management in Education
Eligibility Procedures and accreditation standards for business accreditation
Expanding learning opportunities for graduate students with HyFlex course design
International Journal of Online Pedagogy and Course Design
Identifying keys to success in innovative teaching: Student engagement and instructional practices as predictors of student learning in a course using a team-based learning approach
Teaching & Learning Inquiry
Strategies to engage online students and reduce attrition rates
The Journal of Educators Online
What might online delivery teach us about blended management education? Prior perspectives and future directions
Journal of Management Education
Where are the dedicated scholars of management learning and education?
Management Learning
Student involvement: A developmental theory for higher education
Journal of College Student Personnel
Transitioning to an online world: Using HyFlex courses to bridge the gap
Hybrid courses with flexible participation: The HyFlex course design
Hybrid-flexible course design
Synchromodal classes: Designing for shared learning experiences between face-to-face and online students
International Journal of Designs for Learning
Predictors of instructor practices and course activities that engage online students
Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration
Challenges of student equity and engagement in a HyFlex course
Key factors for determining student satisfaction in online courses
International Journal on E-Learning
Facilitating student engagement through educational technology: Towards a conceptual framework
Journal of Interactive Media in Education
Mapping research in student engagement and educational technology in higher education: A systematic evidence map
International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education
The ideology of student engagement research
Teaching in Higher Education
Handbook of research on student engagement
Measuring student engagement in the online course: The online student engagement scale (OSE)
Online Learning
Tracking online and distance education in Canadian universities and colleges: 2018
School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence
Review of Educational Research
Blended learning in higher education: Framework, principles, and guidelines
Learner engagement in blended learning environments: A conceptual framework
Online Learning
A measure of college student course engagement
The Journal of Educational Research
Students as partners: Reflections on a conceptual model
Teaching & Learning Inquiry: The ISSOTL Journal
An examination of teachers’ strategies to foster student engagement in blended learning in higher education
International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education
Engagement des étudiants : une échelle de mesure multidimensionnelle appliquée à des modalités de cours hybrides universitaires
Mesure et évaluation en éducation
The emergence of choice in “multi-access” learning environments: Transferring locus of control of course access to the learner
Realigning higher education for the 21st-century learner through multi-access learning
MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching
Blended learning: How teachers balance the blend of online and classroom components
Journal of Information Technology Education
Cited by (25)
It's not you, It's me: Can others learn from the challenges of teaching operations and supply chain management?
2022, International Journal of Management EducationCitation Excerpt :Additional techniques to support active learning of OSCM concepts include games, simulations, and applied projects (Ammar & Wright, 1999; Dias, 2017; Heriot et al., 2008; Witt et al., 2019). Instructors could also consider the flipped classroom and HyFlex approach as effective ways to introduce new concepts and reinforce learning with student collaboration (Heilporn & Lakhal, 2021). This approach increases student involvement, task orientation, and innovation (Bergmann & Sams, 2012; Prashar, 2015).
Student Engagement in the HyFlex and Online Classrooms: Lessons from the COVID-19 Pandemic
2024, Technology, Knowledge and LearningUnderstanding the effect of video conferencing learning environments on students' engagement: The role of basic psychological needs
2024, Journal of Computer Assisted LearningDo graduate courses in a HyFlex mode foster emotional, cognitive and behavioral engagement? A consideration
2024, Journal of Applied Learning and TeachingHyFlex teaching experience and reflections in K-12
2024, Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies