Converting a graduate-level course into a HyFlex modality: What are effective engagement strategies?

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2021.100454Get rights and content

Highlights

  • HyFlex is a promising modality for enhancing student engagement in business education

  • Flexible-synchronous sessions ease student learning support and instructor's facilitation role

  • Open and trustful interactions promote behavioral engagement of students in HyFlex courses

  • Links with practice and learning support foster student emotional engagement in HyFlex courses

  • Instructor's facilitation role also encourages student cognitive engagement in HyFlex courses

Abstract

Blended courses are rising in business education, and new modalities have emerged to increase flexibility of students. HyFlex courses combine online asynchronous activities with “flexible-synchronous” activities where students choose to attend online synchronously, face-to-face, or online asynchronously through recordings, bringing them full flexibility of participation. Additionally, the flexible-synchronous activities preserve interaction opportunities between students and the instructor and support student learning. This study reports on the transformation of an operations course into a HyFlex modality to enhance student engagement through regular flexible-synchronous sessions as well as equivalent T&L activities across course sections. The study also brings a new perspective by highlighting effective strategies for engaging students in a HyFlex course. First, exploratory qualitative data suggested that the course organization with weekly flexible-synchronous activities, providing regular interaction opportunities and video-recorded, encouraged student engagement. Engagement strategies were also identified using both quantitative and qualitative data. The main strategies were open and trustful interactions for student behavioral engagement, links with practice and learning support for emotional engagement, and links with practice, learning support and instructor's facilitation role for cognitive engagement. The study suggests that HyFlex is a promising course modality for fostering student engagement at the graduate level, especially in large-group business courses.

Introduction

According to a recent survey (Donovan et al., 2019), the proportion of Canadian higher education institutions offering online and blended courses has respectively grown to 83% and 78% in 2018, and is presumed to expand further in the future. Benefitting from the rapid evolution of information and communication technologies (ICT), these course modalities derive their popularity from their flexibility in terms of time and/or space, allowing students to better balance academic, personal and professional responsibilities, especially at the graduate level (Abdelmalak & Parra, 2016; Lakhal & Khechine, 2017; Taylor et al., 2018). Online and blended course modalities are also very popular in business faculties (Arbaugh, 2014; Kumar et al., 2019; Popovich & Neel, 2005; Wolverton, 2018). In particular, most Masters in Business Administration (MBA) in Laval University (Quebec, Canada), in which this study was conducted, are offered through online and blended modalities to accommodate the diverse needs of students.

Laval University is a multimodal university offering more than a thousand online courses in addition to blended and face-to-face courses. In 2018–2019, alternative course modalities (traditional blended, HyFlex and online) accounted for 26% of total student credits, with a more than 40% increase in the last four years. In particular, the Faculty of Business Administration (FSA ULaval) has developed a leadership position in online and blended learning, offering such courses since 1997 with the expertise and investment of a dedicated team of learning technologists and instructional designers. The development of alternative course modalities is also a component of the faculty strategic plan to facilitate balance between students’ academic, personal and professional responsibilities.

Learning outcomes in online or blended courses are considered equivalent to those of face-to-face courses (Arbaugh, 2014, 2016; Kumar et al., 2019; Popovich & Neel, 2005). However, online (often asynchronous) courses have some major drawbacks, such as high dropout rates and students’ feelings of isolation (Angelino et al., 2007; Bolliger & Martindale, 2004; Kranzow, 2013), which could be associated with a lack of instructor support resulting in lower student satisfaction than in face-to-face courses (Bolliger & Martindale, 2004; Mullen & Tallent-Runnels, 2006). In contrast, blended courses preserve synchronous student-student and student-instructor interactions and yield higher student satisfaction than face-to-face or online asynchronous courses (Owston et al., 2013). While a “traditional” blended course usually refers to a combination of face-to-face and online asynchronous teaching and learning (T&L) activities (Garrison & Kanuka, 2004; Garrison & Vaughan, 2008), new blended modalities have also emerged during the last ten years, whether for cost-optimization purposes or to increase the flexibility and accessibility of higher education for students. These new modalities, labelled blended online (Power, 2008), blended synchronous (Lakhal et al., 2017, 2020), synchromodal (Bell et al., 2014), multi-access (Irvine, 2009; Irvine et al., 2013) or HyFlex (Beatty, 2007, 2019) courses, replace face-to-face sessions with online synchronous sessions for some or all students. Specifically, HyFlex courses combine online asynchronous T&L activities with “flexible-synchronous” T&L activities where students can choose to attend online synchronously, face-to-face, or online asynchronously through recordings and videos. In business faculties, this emerging course modality could be particularly well-suited for MBA students, who often have very diverse backgrounds and needs.

Out of a total of 583 courses at FSA ULaval in 2019, 157 were online (mostly asynchronous), 67 were traditional blended and 43 were HyFlex courses. In keeping with the assumption that one size does not fit all, numerous courses are offered through multiple sections and modalities that enable students to enroll in the one best fitting their styles or needs. At the graduate level, especially, alternative course modalities at FSA ULaval made up 45% of total courses in 2019. In a context where 71.5% of graduate students were registered part-time in 2019, offering almost half of courses in online, traditional blended or HyFlex modalities helps students to balance studies with their work and family responsibilities. Particularly, a growing percentage of courses are now offered in a HyFlex modality given its large flexibility of participation and regular opportunities for interaction with the instructor and other students, especially at the graduate level. This study monitored the transformation of blended and online sections of a graduate level course in operations management into a HyFlex modality at FSA ULaval.

Section snippets

Problem

An increasing number of courses are delivered in multiple course sections and modalities, enabling students to enroll in the one fitting their needs and preferences. However, offering the same course in multiple modalities raises an additional challenge of providing equivalent T&L activities to all students. On the one hand, students in face-to-face (or traditional blended courses) have multiple opportunities to interact with the instructor and other students, but they may expect the instructor

HyFlex courses

The term HyFlex was first introduced by Beatty (2007, 2014) as a combination of Hybrid (i.e., traditional blended in this study) and Flexible (i.e., students’ choice of attendance). Beatty (2007) proposed to build a HyFlex course on four main principles: (i) learner choice, (ii) equivalency, (iii) reusability and (iv) accessibility. The first, learner choice, consists of enabling students to choose a participation mode (face-to-face, online synchronous or online asynchronous) throughout the

Course transformation

The Operations course consists of an introduction to the diverse qualitative and quantitative aspects of operations management, e.g., forecasting, project management, waiting lines analysis, quality management, sales and operations planning, inventory management and material requirement planning. Compulsory in most graduate level programs (M.B.A. or M.Sc.), it welcomes 350 students per year, approximatively, in four distinct course sections. A face-to-face course section is offered in the Fall

Research question 1: According to students’ perceptions, what components of a HyFlex course modality are related to student engagement?

At stage 1, students were asked to identify components of the new course design having an influence on student engagement (Table 1) and to provide additional comments on the identified links. First, the results suggested that the weekly HyFlex sessions have a considerable influence on student behavioral engagement, followed by emotional engagement and cognitive engagement in the course. Students also suggested that the course organization supported their continuous behavioral engagement in the

Discussion

This study explored students' perceptions about a HyFlex modality in relation to student engagement. Both qualitative and quantitative data were collected through questionnaires for two consecutive years. It adds to the sparse literature about student engagement in blended or HyFlex modalities (Taylor et al., 2019). This study brings a new perspective by highlighting strategies to foster student engagement in a HyFlex course. First, components of the new HyFlex modality that were related to

Conclusion

Following the transformation of online and blended sections of a graduate level course in operations management into a HyFlex modality over two consecutive years, this study investigated student engagement and effective engagement strategies in the HyFlex course. Exploratory qualitative data collected at year 1 suggested that the course organization with weekly flexible-synchronous activities, which included regular opportunities for interaction and were video-recorded, fostered student

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Géraldine Heilporn: Conceptualization, Methodology, Investigation, Formal analysis, Writing – original draft. Sawsen Lakhal: Validation, of all stages of the research study, Writing – review & editing.

Declaration of competing interest

None.

Acknowledgments

We thank the two anonymous reviewers for their constructive and useful comments, which helped improve the quality of published work.

References (85)

  • R. Owston et al.

    Student perceptions and achievement in a university blended learning strategic initiative

    The Internet and Higher Education

    (2013)
  • C.C. Wolverton

    Utilizing synchronous discussions to create an engaged classroom in online executive education

    International Journal of Management in Education

    (2018)
  • AACSB

    Eligibility Procedures and accreditation standards for business accreditation

    (2018)
  • M.M.M. Abdelmalak et al.

    Expanding learning opportunities for graduate students with HyFlex course design

    International Journal of Online Pedagogy and Course Design

    (2016)
  • R.M. Alvarez-Bell et al.

    Identifying keys to success in innovative teaching: Student engagement and instructional practices as predictors of student learning in a course using a team-based learning approach

    Teaching & Learning Inquiry

    (2017)
  • L. Angelino et al.

    Strategies to engage online students and reduce attrition rates

    The Journal of Educators Online

    (2007)
  • J.B. Arbaugh

    What might online delivery teach us about blended management education? Prior perspectives and future directions

    Journal of Management Education

    (2014)
  • J.B. Arbaugh

    Where are the dedicated scholars of management learning and education?

    Management Learning

    (2016)
  • A.W. Astin

    Student involvement: A developmental theory for higher education

    Journal of College Student Personnel

    (1984)
  • B. Beatty

    Transitioning to an online world: Using HyFlex courses to bridge the gap

  • B. Beatty

    Hybrid courses with flexible participation: The HyFlex course design

  • B.J. Beatty

    Hybrid-flexible course design

    (2019)
  • J. Bell et al.

    Synchromodal classes: Designing for shared learning experiences between face-to-face and online students

    International Journal of Designs for Learning

    (2014)
  • P. Bigatel et al.

    Predictors of instructor practices and course activities that engage online students

    Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration

    (2018)
  • S. Binnewies et al.

    Challenges of student equity and engagement in a HyFlex course

  • D.U. Bolliger et al.

    Key factors for determining student satisfaction in online courses

    International Journal on E-Learning

    (2004)
  • M. Bond et al.

    Facilitating student engagement through educational technology: Towards a conceptual framework

    Journal of Interactive Media in Education

    (2019)
  • M. Bond et al.

    Mapping research in student engagement and educational technology in higher education: A systematic evidence map

    International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education

    (2020)
  • A. Buckley

    The ideology of student engagement research

    Teaching in Higher Education

    (2018)
  • S.L. Christenson et al.

    Handbook of research on student engagement

    (2012)
  • M.D. Dixson

    Measuring student engagement in the online course: The online student engagement scale (OSE)

    Online Learning

    (2015)
  • D.T. Donovan et al.

    Tracking online and distance education in Canadian universities and colleges: 2018

    (2019)
  • J.A. Fredricks et al.

    School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence

    Review of Educational Research

    (2004)
  • D.R. Garrison et al.

    Blended learning in higher education: Framework, principles, and guidelines

    (2008)
  • L.R. Halverson et al.

    Learner engagement in blended learning environments: A conceptual framework

    Online Learning

    (2019)
  • M.M. Handelsman et al.

    A measure of college student course engagement

    The Journal of Educational Research

    (2005)
  • M. Healey et al.

    Students as partners: Reflections on a conceptual model

    Teaching & Learning Inquiry: The ISSOTL Journal

    (2016)
  • G. Heilporn et al.

    An examination of teachers’ strategies to foster student engagement in blended learning in higher education

    International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education

    (2021)
  • G. Heilporn et al.

    Engagement des étudiants : une échelle de mesure multidimensionnelle appliquée à des modalités de cours hybrides universitaires

    Mesure et évaluation en éducation

    (2020)
  • V. Irvine

    The emergence of choice in “multi-access” learning environments: Transferring locus of control of course access to the learner

  • V. Irvine et al.

    Realigning higher education for the 21st-century learner through multi-access learning

    MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching

    (2013)
  • L.M. Jeffrey et al.

    Blended learning: How teachers balance the blend of online and classroom components

    Journal of Information Technology Education

    (2014)
  • Cited by (25)

    • It's not you, It's me: Can others learn from the challenges of teaching operations and supply chain management?

      2022, International Journal of Management Education
      Citation Excerpt :

      Additional techniques to support active learning of OSCM concepts include games, simulations, and applied projects (Ammar & Wright, 1999; Dias, 2017; Heriot et al., 2008; Witt et al., 2019). Instructors could also consider the flipped classroom and HyFlex approach as effective ways to introduce new concepts and reinforce learning with student collaboration (Heilporn & Lakhal, 2021). This approach increases student involvement, task orientation, and innovation (Bergmann & Sams, 2012; Prashar, 2015).

    • HyFlex teaching experience and reflections in K-12

      2024, Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text