Skip to main content
Log in

More than meets the eye: traditions, nucleus and peripheries of the biographical research field

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The long and established roots of biographical research have been well documented, over the last decades, in a rich body of reflections about the main trends, traditions and contexts of production of the field within social sciences, including the identification of milestones and turns. Most of these notable analyses mapping the field’s key approaches and methods tend to be exclusively qualitatively driven, cross-disciplinary, and focused on particular research practices, national contexts. In this article, our aim is to make an innovative yet complementary contribution to the mapping of biographical research. Our contribution has a broader analytical window of observation by acknowledging not only the field’s main traditions and nucleus, but also its periphery and margins. We carried out a bibliometric analysis based on 1270 sociological publications written in English (journal articles, books and book chapters) and, through multivariate statistical analyses, identified three profiles. The Precursors, the founders of the field, define the key theoretical parameters of a sociological analysis of the relation between biography and society, while testing them empirically. The Engineers are the developers of the biographical method, by creating, producing and implementing methodological tools. The Explorers have a distinctive empirical focus, with publications illustrating the implementation of the bases developed by the Precursors and the Engineers in the collection of biographical data to study specific life contexts. All profiles have a singular contribution to the definition of the field’s structure, contents and dynamics in analytical, methodological and conceptual terms; thus, showing the many faces of biographical research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Source Echoes database (SPSS®)

Fig. 2

Source Echoes database (SPSS® and Excel®)

Fig. 3

Source Echoes database (SPSS® and Excel®)

Fig. 4

Source Echoes database (SPSS® and Excel®)

Fig. 5

Source Echoes database (SPSS® and Excel®)

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abrantes, P. (2013). Socialization and inequality: A biographical approach to the working class in Portugal. Current Sociology, 61(7), 984–1002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Apitzsch, U., & Lena, I. (2000). Biographical analysis: A “German” school? In P. Chamberlayne, J. Bornat, & T. Wengraf (Eds.), The turn to biographical methods in social science: comparative issues and examples. (pp. 53–70). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, P. (2005). Qualitative research—unity and diversity. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 6(3), 26.

  • Atkinson, P., Seweryn, A., & Tirini, S. (2011). Knowing selves: Biographical research and European traditions. International Review of Qualitative Research, 4(4), 461–487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, R. (1998). The Life Story Interview. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bertaux, D. (Ed.). (1981). Biography and society: The life history approach in the social sciences. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertaux, D. (1996). A Response to Thierry Kochuyt’s. Biographical and empiricist illusions: A reply to recent criticism. Biography and Society Newsletter, December 1996, pp. 2–6.

  • Bertaux, D., & Kohli, M. (1984). The life story approach: A continental view. Annual Review of Sociology, 10, 215–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertaux, D., & Thompson, P. (Eds.). (1993). Between generations: family models, Myths and memories. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolívar, A. (2017). Biographical and narrative research in Iberoamerica: Emergence, development and state fields. In I. Goodson, A. Antikainen, P. Sikes, & M. Andrews (Eds.), The routledge international handbook on narrative and life history. (pp. 202–213). Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broadus, R. N. (1987). Toward a definition of ‘bibliometrics.’ Scientometrics, 12(5–6), 373–379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bukowski, J. (1974). Biographical method in Polish sociology. Zeitschrift Für Soziologie, 3(1), 18–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caetano, A., & Nico, M. (2019). Forever young: Creative responses to challenging issues in biographical research. Contemporary Social Science, 14(3–4), 361–378.

  • Carvalho, H. (2008). Análise multivariada de dados qualitativos. Utilização da Análise de Correspondências Múltiplas (ACM) com o SPSS. Lisboa: Sílabo.

  • Chamberlayne, P. (1997). Social exclusion: Sociological traditions and national contexts. In SOSTRIS working paper 1: Social exclusion in comparative perspective. London: Centre for Biography in Social Policy, University of East London.

  • Chamberlayne, P., Bornat, J., & Wengraf, T. (2000). The turn to biographical methods in social science. Comparative issues and examples. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chamberlayne, P., Bornat, J., & Apitzsch, U. (Eds.). (2004). Biographical methods and professional practice: An international perspective. Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cobo, M. J., López-Herrera, A. G., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2012). Scimat: A new science mapping analysis software tool. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(8), 1609–1630

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denzin, N. K. (1989). Interpretive biography. Newbury Park: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrarotti, F. (2003). On the science of uncertainty: The biographical method in social research. Lanham: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer-Rosenthal, W., & Rosenthal, G. (1997). Daniel Bertaux’s complaints or against false dichotomies. In Biography and Society Newsletter (pp. 5–11). December 1997.

  • Gobo, G. (2005). The renaissance of qualitative methods. Forum: Qualitative social research, 6(3), 42.

  • Goodson, I. (2001). The story of life history: Origins of the life history method in sociology. Identity: An International Journal of Theory and Research, 1(2), 129–142.

  • Goodwin, J. (Ed.). (2012). SAGE Biographical Research. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, B. (Ed.). (2009). Life Story Research. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatch, J. A., & Wisniewski, R. (Eds.). (1995). Life history and narrative. London: Routledge.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Heinritz, C., & Rammstedt, A. (1991). L’Approche Biographique en France. Cahiers Internationaux De Sociologie, 91, 331–370

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphrey, R., Miller, R., & Zdravomyslova, E. (Eds.). (2003). Biographical Research in Eastern Europe: Altered Lives and Broken Biographies. London: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jindra, I. W. (2014). Why American sociology needs biographical sociology—European style. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 44(4), 389–412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaźmierska, K. (2014). Analyzing biographical data – different approaches of doing biographical research. Qualitative Sociology Review, X(1), 6–17.

  • Kupferberg, F. (2018). Biography Research in the Nordic Countries. In H. Lutz, M. Schiebel, & E. Tuider (Eds.), Handbuch Biographieforschung. (pp. 765–775). Springer VS.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lechner, E. (2019). Migrants’ lives matter: biographical research, recognition and social participation. Contemporary Social Science, 14(3–4), 500–514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merrill, B., & West, L. (2009). Using biographical methods in social research. London: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Merrill, B., & West, L. (2018). A history of biographical research in the United Kingdom. Revista Brasileira de Pesquisa (Auto)Biográfica, 3(9), 765–780.

  • Miller, R. L. (2000). Researching life stories and family histories. London: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mrozowicki, A. (2011). Coping with Social Change: Life Strategies of Workers in Poland’s New Capitalism. Leuven: Leuven University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nurse, L., & O’Neill, M. (2018). Biographical research in the UK: Profiles and perspectives. In H. Lutz, M. Schiebel, & E. Tuider (Eds.), Handbuch Biographieforschung. (pp. 709–720). Wiesbaden: Springer VS.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill, M., Roberts, B., & Sparkes, A. C. (Eds.). (2015). Advances in biographical methods: Creative applications. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plummer, K. (1995). Telling sexual stories: Power, change and social worlds. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plummer, K. (2001). Documents of life 2: An invitation to a critical humanism. London: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pritchard, A. (1969). Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics. Journal of Documentation, 25(4), 348–349

    Google Scholar 

  • Rammstedt, A. (1995). Biographical research in Italy. Current Sociology, 43(2), 179–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riemann, G. (2003). A joint project against the backdrop of a research tradition: An introduction to “doing biographical research”. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 4(3), 18.

  • Roberts, B. (2002). Biographical research. Principles and Practice. Philadelphia: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, G. (1993). Reconstruction of life stories: Principles of selection in generating stories for narrative biographical interviews. The Narrative Study of Lives, 1(1), 59–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, G., & Fischer-Rosenthal, W. (2004). The analysis of narrative-biographical interviews. In U. Flick, E. Kardoff, & I. Steinke (Eds.), A companion to qualitative research. (pp. 259–265). London:Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schütze, F. (2003). Hülya’s migration to Germany as self-sacrifice undergone and suffered in love for her parents, and her later biographical individualization. Biographical problems and biographical work of marginalisation and individualisation of a young Turkish woman in Germany. Part I. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 4(3), 23.

  • Schütze, F. (2014). Autobiographical accounts of war experiences. An outline for the analysis of topically focused autobiographical texts—using the example of the “Robert Rasmus” account in studs Terkel’s book, “The Good War”. Qualitative Sociology Review, X(1), 224–283.

  • Shaw, C. R. (1966). The Jack-Roller: A delinquent Boy’s own story. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Spanò, A., Perone, E., & Domecka, M. (2013). Biographical costs of transnational mobility in the European space. In J. D. Turk & A. Mrozowicki (Eds.), Realist biography and European policy: An innovative approach to European policy studies. (pp. 93–114). Leuven: Leuven University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, L. (1992). The auto/biographical I: The theory and practice of feminist auto/biography. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, L. (Ed.). (2013). Documents of life revisited: narrative and biographical methodology for a 21st century critical humanism. Farnham: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szász, A. L., & Vajda, J. (2018). Biographical research in Hungary. In H. Lutz, M. Schiebel, & E. Tuider (Eds.), Handbuch Biographieforschung. (pp. 107–123). Wiesbaden: Springer VS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, W. I., & Znaniecki, F. (1918–20). The Polish peasant in Europe and America: Monograph of an immigrant group, Boston: The Gorham Press.

  • Thomson, R., & Holland, J. (2005). “Thanks for the memory”: Memory books as a methodological resource in biographical research. Qualitative Research, 5(2), 201–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wengraf, T., Chamberlayne, P., & Bornat, J. (2002). A biographical turn in the social sciences? A British-European view. Cultural Studies—Critical Methodologies, 2(2), 245–269.

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [PTDC/SOC-SOC/29117/2017].

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ana Caetano.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Caetano, A., Nico, M., Baía, J. et al. More than meets the eye: traditions, nucleus and peripheries of the biographical research field. Scientometrics 126, 5707–5726 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-04020-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-04020-y

Keywords

Navigation