Bibliography
Achinstein, P. (2001). The Book of Evidence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Alicke, M. D. (1992). Culpable causation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(3): 368–378. Alicke, M. D. (2000). Culpable control and the psychology of blame. Psychological Bulletin, 126(4): 556–574.
Alston, W. P. (1988). The deontological concept of epistemic justification. Philosophical Perspectives, 2: 257–299.
Alvarez, M. (2009). How many kinds of reasons? Philosophical Explorations, 12(2): 181–193.
Alvarez, M. (2010). Kinds of Reasons: An Essay in the Philosophy of Action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Anscombe, G. E. M. (1957). Intention (2nd Edition). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Aristotle, . (1941). Nichomachean Ethics [350 BCE]. In McKeon, R. (Ed.) and Ross, W. D. (Trans.), The Basic Works of Aristotle. New York, NY: Random House.
Arpaly, N. (2002). Unprincipled Virtue. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Audi, R. (1999). Self-evidence. Philosophical Perspectives, 13: 205–228.
Audi, R. (2003). Contemporary foundationalism. In Pojman, L. P. (Ed.), Theory of Knowledge: Classic and Contemporary Readings (3rd Edition, pp. 204–211). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company.
Audi, R. (2011). Epistemology: A Contemporary Introduction to the Theory of Knowledge (3rd Edition). New York, NY: Routledge.
Austin, J. L. (1956). A plea for excuses. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 57: 1–30.
Austin, J. L. (1962). Sense and Sensibilia. Warnock, Geoffrey (Ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Baron, J. and Hershey, J. (1988). Outcome bias in decision evaluation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(4): 569–579.
Benton, M. (2011). Two more for the knowledge account of assertion. Analysis, 71: 684–687.
Bergmann, M. (2006). Justification without Awareness. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Bergmann, M. (2008). Reidian externalism. In Hendricks, V. and Pritchard, D. (Eds.), New Waves in Epistemology (pp. 52–74). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Bird, A. (2007). Justified judging. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 74: 81–110.
Boghossian, P. A. (1992). Externalism and inference. Philosophical Issues, 2: 11–28.
Boghossian, P. A. (2008). Content and Justification. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
BonJour, L. (1980). Externalist theories of empirical knowledge. Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 5: 53–73.
BonJour, L. (1985). The Structure of Empirical Knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
BonJour, L. and Sosa, E. (2003). Epistemic Justification: Internalism vs. Externalism, Foundations vs. Virtues. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Brogaard, B. (2016). Staying indoors: How phenomenal dogmatism solves the skeptical problem without going externalist. In Coppenger, B. and Bergmann, M. (Eds.), Intellectual Assurance (pp. 85–104). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bromberger, S. (1966). Questions. The Journal of Philosophy, 63: 597–606.
Broome, J. (2013). Rationality through Reasoning. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.
Brown, J. (2004). Anti-Individualism and Knowledge. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Brown, J. (2008). Subject-sensitive invariantism and the knowledge norm for practical reasoning. Noûs, 42(2): 167–189.
Brueckner, A. (1994). The structure of skeptical arguments. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 54: 827–835.
Brueckner, A. (2009). E = K and perceptual knowledge. In Greenough, P. and Pritchard, D. (Eds.), Williamson on Knowledge (pp. 5–11). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Brueckner, A. (2012). Essays on Skepticism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Brunero, J. (2013). Reasons as explanations. Philosophical Studies, 165: 805–824.
Buckwalter, W. (in press). Epistemic contextualism and linguistic behavior. In Ichikawa, J. J. (Ed.), Handbook of Epistemic Contextualism. New York, NY: Routledge.
Buckwalter, W. and Stich, S. (2014). Gender and philosophical intuition. In Knobe, J. and Nichols, S. (Eds.), Experimental Philosophy (2nd Edition, pp. 307–346). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Buckwalter, W. and Turri, J. (in press). Modest scientism in philosophy. In Ridder, J. R., Peels, R. and van Woudenberg, R. (Eds.), Scientism: Prospects and Problems. Oxford University Press.
Burge, T. (1979). Individualism and the mental. Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 4(1): 73–122.
Burge, T. (1988). Individualism and self-knowledge. Journal of Philosophy, 85: 649–663.
Burge, T. (2003). Perceptual entitlement. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 67(3): 503–548.
Burge, T. (2005). Disjunctivism and perceptual psychology. Philosophical Topics, 33(1): 1–78.
Burge, T. (2010). Origins of Objectivity. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Burge, T. (2011). Disjunctivism again. Philosophical Explorations, 14(1): 43–80.
Byrne, A. (2014). Perception and evidence. Philosophical Studies, 170: 101–113.
Campbell, J. (2002). Reference and Consciousness. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Carter, J. A., Gordon, E. and Jarvis, B. (Eds.) (forthcoming). Knowledge-First. Oxford University Press.
Chalmers, D. (2005). The matrix as metaphysics. In Grau, C. (Ed.), Philosophers Explore the Matrix (pp. 132–175). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Chisholm, R. (1964). The myth of the given. In Chisholm, R. (Ed.), Philosophy (pp. 261–286). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Chisholm, R. (1977). Theory of Knowledge (2nd Edition). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Chisholm, R. (1989). Theory of Knowledge (3rd Edition). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Clarke, R. (2013). Belief is credence one (in context). Philosophers’ Imprint, 13(11): 1–18.
Coates, A. (2012). Rational epistemic akrasia. American Philosophical Quarterly, 49: 113–124.
Cohen, S. (1984). Justification and truth. Philosophical Studies, 46(3): 279–295.
Cohen, S. (1998). Two kinds of sceptical argument. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 58: 143–159.
Cohen, S. (2016). Theorizing about the epistemic. Inquiry, 59(7–8): 839–857.
Cohen, S. and Lehrer, K. (1983). Justification, truth, and knowledge. Synthese, 55(2): 191–207.
Comesaña, J. (2002). The diagonal and the demon. Philosophical Studies, 110(3): 249–266.
Comesaña, J. (2016). Falsehood and entailment. Philosophical Perspectives, 29: 82–94.
Comesaña, J. and McGrath, M. (2014). Having false reasons. In Littlejohn, C. and Turri, J. (Eds.), Epistemic Norms (pp. 59–80). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Condoravdi, C. and Lauer, S. (2016). Anankastic conditionals are just conditionals. Semantics and Pragmatics, 9(8): 1–69.
Conee, E. (1998). Seeing the truth. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 58(4): 847–857.
Conee, E. (2004). The basic nature of epistemic justification [1988]. In Conee, E. and Feldman, R. (Eds.), Evidentialism (pp. 37–52). Oxford: Blackwell.
Conee, E. and Feldman, R. (2004). Evidentialism: Essays in Epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Conee, E. and Feldman, R. (2008). Evidence. In Smith, Q. (Ed.), Epistemology: New Essays (pp. 83–104). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Conee, E. and Feldman, R. (2011). Replies. In Dougherty, T. (Ed.), Evidentialism and Its Discontents (pp. 281–329). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dancy, J. (2000). Practical Reality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dancy, J. (2003). Replies. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 67(2): 468–490.
Dancy, J. (2011). Acting in ignorance. Frontiers of Philosophy in China, 6(3): 345–357.
Dancy, J. (2014). On knowing one’s reason. In Littlejohn, C. and Turri, J. (Eds.), Epistemic Norms (pp. 81–96). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Darwall, S. (2003). Desires, reasons, and causes. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 67: 436–443.
Davidson, D. (1963). Actions, reasons, and causes. The Journal of Philosophy, 60: 685–700.
Davidson, D. (1983). A coherence theory of truth and knowledge. In Henrich, D. (Ed.), Kant oder Hegel? Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta.
Davidson, D. (2001). Essays on Actions and Events (2nd Edition). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Dougherty, T. (Ed.) (2011a). Evidentialism and Its Discontents. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dougherty, T. (2011b). Introduction. In Dougherty, T. (Ed.), Evidentialism and Its Discontents (pp. 1–15). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dougherty, T. (2011c). In defense of propositionalism about evidence. In Dougherty, T. (Ed.), Evidentialism and Its Discontents (pp. 226–235). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dougherty, T. and Rysiew, P. (2014). Experience first (etc.). In Steup, M., Turri, J., and Sosa, E. (Eds.), Contemporary Debates in Epistemology (2nd Edition, pp. 10–16, 17–22, 25–26). Malden, MA: Wiley Blackwell.
Dretske, F. (1970). Epistemic operators. Journal of Philosophy, 67: 1007–1023.
Dretske, F. (2005a). Reply to Hawthorne. In Sosa, E. and Steup, M. (Eds.), Contemporary Debates in Epistemology (pp. 43–46). Oxford: Blackwell.
Dretske, F. (2005b). The case against closure. In Sosa, E. and Steup, M. (Eds.), Contemporary Debates in Epistemology (pp. 13–26). Oxford: Blackwell.
Dunn, J. (2012). Evidential externalism. Philosophical Studies, 158: 435–455.
Dutant, J. (forthcoming). Knowledge-based decision theory and the new evil demon. In Dorsch, F. and Dutant, J. (Eds.), The New Evil Demon. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Easwaran, K. and Fitelson, B. (2015). Accuracy, coherence, and evidence. In Hawthorne, J. and Gendler, T. (Eds.), Oxford Studies in Epistemology (Vol. 5, pp. 61–96). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Enoch, D. (2009). Wouldn’t it be nice if p, therefore, p (for a moral p). Utilitas, 21: 222–224.
Enoch, D. (2010). Not just a truthometer: Taking oneself seriously (but not too seriously) in cases of peer disagreement. Mind, 119(476): 953–997.
Enoch, D. (2012). Being responsible, taking responsibility, and penumbral agency. In Heuer, U. and Lang, G. (Eds.), Luck, Value and Commitment: Themes from the Ethics of Bernard Williams (pp. 95–132). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Fann, K. (Ed.) (1969). Symposium on J.L. Austin. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Fantl, J. and McGrath, M. (2009). Knowledge in an Uncertain World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Farkas, K. (2008). The Subject’s Point of View. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Feldman, R. (1988). Subjective and objective justification in ethics and epistemology. The Monist, 71: 405–419.
Feldman, R. (2003). Epistemology. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Feldman, R. (2014). Justification is internal. In Steup, M., Turri, J., and Sosa, E. (Eds.), Contemporary Debates in Epistemology (2nd Edition, pp. 337–350). Malden, MA: Wiley Blackwell.
Feldman, R. and Conee, E. (1985). Evidentialism. Philosophical Studies, 48(1): 15–34. Reprinted in Evidentialism (pp. 83–100). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Finlay, S. (2014). Confusion of Tongues: A Theory of Normative Language. Oxford University Press.
Firth, R. (1956). Ultimate evidence. The Journal of Philosophy, 53(23): 732–739.
Fitelson, B. (1999). The plurality of Bayesian measures of confirmation and the problem of measure sensitivity. Proceedings of the Philosophy of Science Association, 66: 362–378.
Fogal, D. (2016a). Reasons, reason, and context. In Lord, E. and Maguire, B. (Eds.), Weighing Reasons. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Fogal, D. (2016b). Review of Stephen Finlay’s Confusion of Tongues: A Theory of Normative Language. Ethics, 127: 281–288.
Fogal, D. and Sylvan, K. (2017). Contextualism about epistemic reasons. In Ichikawa, J. J. (Ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Epistemic Contextualism. New York, NY: Routledge.
Foley, R. (2001). The foundational role of epistemology in a general theory of rationality. In Fairweather, A. and Zagzebski, L. (Eds.), Virtue Epistemology: Essays on Epistemic Virtue and Responsibility (pp. 214–230). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Fumerton, R. (2006). Epistemology. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Gao, J. (2017). Rational action without knowledge (and vice versa). Synthese, 124(6): 1901–1917.
Gerken, M. (2009). Conceptual equivocation and epistemic relevance. Dialectica, 63(2): 117–132.
Gerken, M. (2011). Warrant and action. Synthese, 178(3): 529–547.
Gerken, M. (2012). Discursive justification and skepticism. Synthese, 189(2): 373–394.
Gerken, M. (2013). Epistemic Reasoning and the Mental. Macmillan, Palgrave, Innovations in Philosophy Series. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Gerken, M. (2014). Same, same but different: The epistemic norms of assertion, action and practical reasoning. Philosophical Studies, 168(3): 745–767.
Gerken, M. (2015). The roles of knowledge ascriptions in epistemic assessment. European Journal of Philosophy, 23(1): 141–161.
Gerken, M. (2017). On Folk Epistemology: How we think and talk about knowledge. Oxford University Press.
Gerken, M. (forthcoming a). Epistemic entitlement – Its scope and limits. In Graham, P. and Pedersen, N. (Eds.), Epistemic Entitlement. Oxford University Press.
Gerken, M. (forthcoming b). Against Knowledge-First Epistemology. In Carter, A., Gordon, E., and Jarvis, B. (Eds.), Knowledge-First Approaches in Epistemology and Mind. Oxford University Press.
Gibbons, J. (2010a). The Norm of Belief. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gibbons, J. (2010b). Things that make things reasonable. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 81: 335–361.
Gigerenzer, G. (2014). Risk Savvy: How to Make Good Decisions. New York, NY: Viking.
Ginet, C. (1975). Knowledge, Perception, and Memory. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.
Goldberg, S. (2016). Comments on Pritchard’s Epistemological Disjunctivism. Journal of Philosophical Research, 41: 183–191.
Goldman, A. (1967). A causal theory of knowing. Journal of Philosophy, 64: 357–372.
Goldman, A. (1976) Discrimination and perceptual knowledge. Journal of Philosophy, 73: 771–791.
Goldman, A. I. (1979). What is justified belief? In Pappas, G. (Ed.), Justification and Knowledge. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.
Goldman, A. (1986). Epistemology and Cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Goldman, A. (2009). Williamson on knowledge and evidence. In Greenough, P. and Pritchard, D. (Eds.), Williamson on Knowledge (pp. 73–92). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Graham, P. (2012). Epistemic entitlement. Noûs, 46(3): 449–482.
Greco, D. (2014). A puzzle about epistemic akrasia. Philosophical Studies, 167: 201–219.
Greco, J. (2002). How to Reid Moore. The Philosophical Quarterly, 52(209): 544–563.
Greco, J. (2010). Achieving Knowledge: A Virtue-Theoretic Account of Epistemic Normativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Greenough, P. and Pritchard, D. (Eds.) (2009). Williamson on Knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Grice, P. (2001). Aspects of Reason. Oxford University Press.
Haddock, A. and Macpherson, F. (Eds.) (2008). Disjunctivism: Perception, Action, Knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Harman, G. (1986). Change in View. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Hatzimoysis, A. (Ed.) (2011). Self-Knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hawthorne, J. (2005). The case for closure. In Sosa, E. and Steup, M. (Eds.), Contemporary Debates in Epistemology (pp. 26–43). Oxford: Blackwell.
Hawthorne, J. and Magidor, O. (forthcoming). Reflections on reasons. In Star, D. (Ed.), Oxford Handbook of Reasons and Normativity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hawthorne, J. and Stanley, J. (2008). Knowledge and action. Journal of Philosophy, 105(10): 571–590.
Hempel, C. (1965). Aspects of Scientific Explanation and Other Essays in the Philosophy of Science. New York: The Free Press.
Herman, B. (1993). The Practice of Moral Judgment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Hinton, J. M. (1967). Visual experiences. Mind, 76: 217–227.
Hinton, J. M. (1973). Experiences. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Holton, R. (2008). Partial belief, partial intention. Mind, 117: 27–58.
Holton, R. (2014): Intention as a model for belief. In Vargas, M. and Yaffe, G. (Eds.), Rational and Social Agency: Essays on the Philosophy of Michael Bratman. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hornsby, J. (2007a). Knowledge, belief, and reasons for acting. In Penco, C., Beaney, M. and Vignolo, M. (Eds.), Explaining the Mental (pp. 88–105). Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Hornsby, J. (2007b). Knowledge in action. In Leist, A. (Ed.), Action in Context (pp. 285–302). Berlin: de Gruyter.
Hornsby, J. (2008). A disjunctive conception of acting for reasons. In Macpherson, F. and Haddock, A. (Eds.), Disjunctivism: Perception, Action, Knowledge (pp. 244–261). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Horowitz, S. (2014). Immoderately rational. Philosophical Studies, 167(1): 41–56.
Huddleston, R. and Pullum, G. K. (2002). The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Huemer, M. (2001). Scepticism and the Veil of Perception. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
Huemer, M. (2007). Compassionate phenomenal conservatism. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 74: 30–55.
Huemer, M. (forthcoming). Defending a brain in a vat. In Dorsch, F. and Dutant, J. (Eds.), The New Evil Demon. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hughes, N. (2014). Is knowledge the ability to φ for the reason that p? Episteme, 11: 457–462.
Humberstone, I. L. (1987). Wanting as believing. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 17: 49–62.
Humberstone, I. L. (1992). Direction of fit. Mind, 101: 59–83.
Hyman, J. (1999). How knowledge works. Philosophical Quarterly, 49: 433–451.
Hyman, J. (2008). Evidence: Fundamental concepts and the phenomenal conception. Philosophy Compass, 3(5): 933–955.
Hyman, J. (2010). The road to Larissa. Ratio, 23(4): 393–414.
Hyman, J. (2011). Acting for reasons: Reply to Dancy. Frontiers of Philosophy in China, 6(3): 358–368.
Hyman, J. (2015). Action, Knowledge, and Will. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ichikawa, J. J. (2012). Knowledge norms and acting well. Thought: A Journal of Philosophy, 1(1): 49–55.
Ichikawa, J. J. (2013). Basic knowledge and contextualist E = K. Thought: A Journal of Philosophy, 2(4): 282–292.
Ichikawa, J. J. (2014). Justification is potential knowledge. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 44(2): 184–206.
Ichikawa, J. J. (2017). Contextualising Knowledge: Epistemology and Semantics. Oxford University Press.
Ichikawa, J. and Jarvis, B. (2013). The Rules of Thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Jackson, F. (1991). Decision-theoretic Consequentialism and the nearest and dearest objection. Ethics, 101: 461–482.
Jenkins, C. S. (2008). Romeo, René, and the reasons why: What explanation is. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 108: 61–84.
Jenkins, C. S. and Nolan, D. (2008). Backwards explanation. Philosophical Studies, 140: 103–115.
Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, Fast and Slow. Toronto: Doubleday.
Kallestrup, J. (2012). Semantic Externalism. Oxford: Routledge.
Kaplan, Mark. (2009). Williamson’s causal approach to probabilism. In Greenough, P. and Pritchard, D. (Eds.), Williamson on Knowledge (pp. 122–139). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kelly, T. (2008). Evidence: Fundamental concepts and the phenomenal conception. Philosophy Compass, 3(5): 933–955.
Kennedy, M. (2010). Naïve Realism and experiential evidence. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 110: 77–109.
Kiesewetter, B. (2016). You ought to φ only if you may believe that you ought to φ. Philosophical Quarterly, 66(265): 760–782.
Kolodny, N. (2005). Why be rational? Mind, 114(445): 509–563.
Kornblith, H. (2015). The role of reasons in epistemology. Episteme, 12(2): 225–239.
Kosko, B. (1993). Fuzzy Thinking: The New Science of Fuzzy Logic. New York, NY: Hyperion.
Kripke, S. (2011). A puzzle about belief. In Philosophical Troubles [1979] (pp. 125–161). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Kvanvig, J. (2009). Assertion, knowledge, and lotteries. In Greenough, P. and Pritchard, D. (Eds.), Williamson on Knowledge (pp. 140–160). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lackey, J. (2010). Acting on knowledge. Philosophical Perspectives, 24(1): 361–382.
Lasonen-Aarnio, M. (MS). Enkrasia or Evidentialism: Learning to Love Mismatch.
Lehrer, K. (1989). Thomas Reid. Oxford: Blackwell.
Lehrer, K. (2000). Discursive knowledge. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 60(3): 637–653.
Lehrer, K. and Cohen, S. (1983). Justification, truth, and coherence. Synthese, 55: 191–207.
Leite, A. (2013). But that’s not evidence; it’s not even true! The Philosophical Quarterly, 63(250): 81–104.
Lewis, D. (1986). Causal explanation. Philosophical Papers, Vol. 2. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Lewis, D. (1996). Elusive knowledge. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 74: 549–567.
Lieberman, M. D. (2013). Social: Why Our Brains Are Wired to Connect. New York, NY: Crown Publishers.
Littlejohn, C. (2009a). The new evil demon problem. In Dowden, B. and Fieser, J. (Eds.), The Internet Encyclopaedia of Philosophy. Available at www.iep.utm.edu/evil-new/. Littlejohn, C. (2009b). The externalist’s demon. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 39(3): 399–434.
Littlejohn, C. (2011). Evidence and knowledge. Erkenntnis, 74: 241–262.
Littlejohn, C. (2012). Justification and the Truth-Connection. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Littlejohn, C. (2013a). No evidence is false. Acta Analytica, 28(2): 145–159.
Littlejohn, C. (2013b). The Russellian retreat. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 113(3): 293–320.
Littlejohn, C. (2014). The unity of reason. In Littlejohn, C. and Turri, J. (Eds.), Epistemic Norms (pp. 135–154). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Littlejohn, C. (2015a). Stop making sense? On a puzzle about rationality. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 92(3). DOI: 10.1111/phpr.12271.
Littlejohn, C. (2015b). Knowledge and awareness. Analysis, 75: 596–603.
Littlejohn, C. (forthcoming a). How and why knowledge is first. In Carter, A., Gordon, E., and Jarvis, B. (Eds.), Knowledge-First. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Littlejohn, C. (forthcoming b). Pritchard’s reasons. Journal of Philosophical Research.
Littlejohn, C. (forthcoming c). A plea for epistemic excuses. In Dorsch, F. and Dutant, J. (Eds.), The New Evil Demon. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Locke, D. (2014). Knowledge norms and assessing them well. Thought: A Journal of Philosophy, 3(1): 80–89.
Locke, D. (2015). Knowledge, explanation, and motivation. American Philosophical Quarterly, 52: 215–233.
Locke, J. (1975). An Essay Concerning Human Understanding [1690]. (Nidditch, P. H., Ed.) Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Logins, A. (2014). The problem of massive deception for justification norms of action. Acta Analytic, 29(4): 457–468.
Lord, Errol. (2010). Having reasons and the factoring account. Philosophical Studies, 149(3): 283–296.
Lord, E. (2015). Acting for the right reasons, abilities, and obligation. In Shafer-Landau, R. (Ed.), Oxford Studies in Metaethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lord, E. (forthcoming a). Defeating the externalist’s demons. In Dorsch, F. and Dutant, J. (Eds.), The New Evil Demon. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lord, E. (forthcoming b). The Importance of Being Rational. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lyons, J. (2013). Should reliabilists be worried about demon worlds? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 86(1): 1–40.
MacFarlane, J. (2016). Assessment Sensitivity: Relative Truth and Its Applications. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mantel, S. (2013). Acting for reasons, apt action, and knowledge. Synthese, 190: 3865–3888.
Mantel, S. (2014). No reason for identity: On the relation between motivating and normative reasons. Philosophical Explorations, 17: 49–62.
Mantel, S. (2015). Worldly reasons: An ontological inquiry into motivating considerations and normative reasons. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly. DOI: 10.1111/papq.12094.
Marion, M. (2000). Oxford realism: Knowledge and perception (Parts I and II). British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 8: 299–338 & 485–519.
Marks, G., and Miller, N. (1987). Ten years of research on the false-consensus effect: An empirical and theoretical review. Psychological Bulletin, 102(1): 72.
Mazzocco, P., Alicke, M., and Davis, T. (2004). On the robustness of outcome bias: No constraint by prior culpability. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 26: 131–146.
McDowell, J. (1982). Criteria, defeasibility, and knowledge. Proceedings of the British Academy, 68: 455–479.
McDowell, J. (1994). Mind and World. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
McDowell, J. (1995). Knowledge and the internal. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 55: 877–893.
McDowell, J. (1998). Singular thought and the extent of inner space. In Meaning, Knowledge, and Reality (pp. 228–259). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
McDowell, J. (2010). Tyler Burge on disjunctivism. Philosophical Explorations, 13(3): 243–255.
McDowell, J. (2013a). Acting in the light of a fact. In Bakhurst, D., Hooker, B., and Little, B. O. (Eds.), Thinking About Reasons: Themes from the Philosophy of Jonathan Dancy (pp. 13–28). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
McDowell, J. (2013b). Tyler Burge on disjunctivism (II). Philosophical Explorations, 16(3): 259–279.
McGlynn, A. (2014). Knowledge First? Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
McKinnon, R. (2013). The supportive reasons norm of assertion. American Philosophical Quarterly, 50: 121–135.
McKinsey, M. (1991). Anti-individualism and privileged access. Analysis, 51: 9–16.
McLaughlin, B. (2013). Why rationalisation is not a species of causal explanation. In D’Oro, G. and Sandis, C. (Eds.), Reasons and Causes: Causalism and Anti-Causalism in the Philosophy of Action. London: Palgrave McMillan.
Millikan, R. G. (1996). On swampkinds. Mind and Language, 11(1): 103–117.
Miracchi, L. (2017). Perspectival externalism is the antidote for radical skepticism. Episteme, 14(3): 363–379.
Miracchi, L. (forthcoming). Competent perspectives and the new evil demon problem. In Dorsch, F. and Dutant, J. (Eds.), The New Evil Demon. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mitova, V. (2015). Truthy psychologism about evidence. Philosophical Studies, 172: 1105–1126.
Mitova, V. (2017). Believeable Evidence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Moore, G. E. (1925). A defence of common sense. In Muirhead, J. H. (Ed.), Contemporary British Philosophy (2nd series, pp. 193–223). London: Allen & Unwin.
Moore, G. E. (1939). Proof of an external world. Proceedings of the British Academy, 25: 273–300.
Nagel, J. (2013). Knowledge as a mental state. Oxford Studies in Epistemology, 4: 275–310.
Nagel, J. (2014). Knowledge: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Neta, R. (2003). Contextualism and the problem of the external world. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 66: 1–31.
Neta, R. (2008). What evidence do you have? British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 59: 8–19.
Neta, R. (2009). Defeating the dogma of defeasibility. In Greenough, P. and Pritchard, D. (Eds.), Williamson on Knowledge (pp. 161–182). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Neta, R. (2011). The nature and reach of privileged access. In Hatzimoysis, A. (Ed.), Self-Knowledge (pp. 9–32). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Neta, R. (forthcoming). How Holy is the Disjunctivist Grail? Journal of Philosophical Research.
Neta, R. and Pritchard, D. H. (2007). McDowell and the New Evil Genius. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 74: 381–396. Nolfi, K. (2015). How to be a Normativist about the nature of belief. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 96: 181–204.
Nozick, R. (1981). Philosophical Explanations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Nuccetelli, S. (1999). What anti-individualists cannot know a priori. Analysis, 59: 48–51.
Parfit, D. (1984). Reasons and Persons. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Parfit, D. (1997). Reasons and motivation. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volume, 71: 99–129.
Parfit, D. (2001). Rationality and reasons. In Egonsson, D., Joesefsson, J., Petersson, B., and Rønnow-Rasmussen, T. (Eds.), Exploring Practical Philosophy: From Action to Values (pp. 19–39). Ashgate.
Parfit, D. (2011). On What Matters. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Paul, L. and Hall, N. (2013). Causation: A User’s Guide. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Phillips Griffiths, A. (Ed.) (1967). Knowledge and Belief. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Plantinga, A. (1993). Warrant and Proper Function. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pollock, J. and Cruz, J. (1999). Contemporary Theories of Knowledge (2nd Edition). Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
Preston-Roedder, R. (2014). A better world. Philosophical Studies, 168: 629–644.
Prichard, H. (1950). Knowledge and Perception. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Pritchard, D. H. (2002a). Recent work on radical skepticism. American Philosophical Quarterly, 39: 215–257.
Pritchard, D. H. (2002b). Resurrecting the Moorean response to the sceptic. International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 10: 283–307.
Pritchard, D. H. (2005a). Epistemic Luck. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pritchard, D. H. (2005b). The structure of sceptical arguments. Philosophical Quarterly, 55: 37–52.
Pritchard, D. H. (2007). How to be a neo-Moorean. In Goldberg, S. (Ed.), Internalism and Externalism in Semantics and Epistemology (pp. 68–99). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pritchard, D. H. (2008). McDowellian neo-Mooreanism. In Haddock, A. and Macpherson, F. (Eds.), Disjunctivism: Perception, Action, Knowledge (pp. 283–310). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pritchard, D. H. (2010). Relevant alternatives, perceptual knowledge, and discrimination. Noûs, 44: 245–68.
Pritchard, D. H. (2011a). Epistemological disjunctivism and the basis problem. Philosophical Issues, 21: 434–455.
Pritchard, D. H. (2011b). Evidentialism, internalism, disjunctivism. In Dougherty, T. (Ed.), Evidentialism and Its Discontents (pp. 362–392). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pritchard, D. H. (2011c). Wittgenstein on scepticism. In Kuusela, O. and McGinn, M. (Eds.), Oxford Handbook on Wittgenstein (pp. 521–547). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pritchard, D. H. (2012). Epistemological Disjunctivism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pritchard, D. H. (2014). Sceptical intuitions. In Rowbottom, D. and Booth, T. (Eds.), Intuitions (pp. 213–231). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pritchard, D. H. (2015a). Epistemic Angst: Radical Skepticism and the Groundlessness of Our Believing. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Pritchard, D. H. (2015b). Précis of epistemological disjunctivism. Analysis, 75: 589–595.
Pritchard, D. H. (2015c). Responses to my critics. Analysis, 75: 627–637.
Pritchard, D. H. (2016). Epistemic angst. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. DOI: 10.1111/phpr.12280.
Pritchard, D. H. (2017). Wittgenstein on hinges and radical scepticism in On Certainty. In Glock, H.-J. and Hyman, J. (Eds.), Blackwell Companion to Wittgenstein. Oxford: Blackwell.
Pritchard, D. H. (forthcoming a). Précis of epistemological disjunctivism. Journal of Philosophical Research.
Pritchard, D. H. (forthcoming b). Responses to my critics. Journal of Philosophical Research.
Pritchard, D. H. (forthcoming c). Shadowlands. In Dorsch, F. and Dutant, J. (Eds.), The New Evil Demon. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pryor, J. (2007). Reasons and that-clauses. Philosophical Issues, 17(1): 217–244.
Pryor, J. (2014). There is immediate justification. In Steup, M., Turri, J. and Sosa, E. (Eds.), Contemporary Debates in Epistemology (2nd Edition, pp. 202–222). Malden, MA: Wiley Blackwell.
Putnam, H. (1973). Meaning and reference. Journal of Philosophy, 70: 699–711.
Putnam, H. (1975). The meaning of ‘meaning’. Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 7: 131–193.
Putnam, H. (1981). Reason, Truth, and History. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Raz, J. (1975). Practical Norms. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Raz, J. (1999). Engaging Reason: On the Theory of Value and Action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Raz, J. (2011). From Normativity to Responsibility. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Regan, D. (1980). Utilitarianism and Cooperation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Reid, T. (1997). An Inquiry into the Human Mind on the Principles of Common Sense [1764]. (Brookes, D. R., Ed.) Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press and University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
Reid, T. (2002). Essays on the Intellectual Powers of Man [1785]. (Brookes, D. R., Ed.) Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Roberts, C. (2012a). Information structure in discourse: Towards an integrated formal theory of pragmatics. Semantics & Pragmatics, 5(6): 1–69.
Roberts, C. (2012b). Information structure: Afterword. Semantics and Pragmatics, 5(7): 1–19.
Russell, B. (2001). Epistemic and moral duty. In Steup, M. (Ed.), Knowledge, Truth, and Duty: Essays on Epistemic Justification, Responsibility, and Virtue (pp. 34–48). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ryan, S. (1991). The preface paradox. Philosophical Studies, 64: 293–307.
Ryle, G. (2009). The Concept of Mind [1949]. (60th Anniversary Edition) New York, NY: Routledge.
Rysiew, P. (2005). Reidian evidence. Journal of Scottish Philosophy, 3(2): 107–121.
Rysiew, P. (2008). Rationality disputes – Psychology and epistemology. Philosophy Compass, 3(6): 1153–1176.
Rysiew, P. (2011). Making it evident: Evidence and evidentness, justification and belief. In Dougherty, T. (Ed.), Evidentialism and Its Discontents (pp. 207–225). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sandis, C. (2013). Can action-explanations ever be non-factive. In Bakhurst, D., Little, M. O., and Hooker, B. (Eds.), Thinking about Reasons: Themes from the Philosophy of Jonathan Dancy (pp. 29–49). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sawyer, S. and Majors, B. (2005). The epistemological argument for content externalism. Philosophical Perspectives, 19(1): 257–280.
Sayre-McCord, G. (MS). On a Theory of a Better Morality.
Scanlon, T. M. (1998). What We Owe to Each Other. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Schönbaumsfeld, G. (2015). Epistemological disjunctivism, by Duncan Pritchard. Analysis, 75: 604–615.
Schroeder, M. (2007). Slaves of the Passions. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Schroeder, M. (2008). Having reasons. Philosophical Studies, 139(1): 57–71.
Schroeter, L. and Schroeter, F. (2009). Reasons as right-makers. Philosophical Explorations, 12(3): 279–296.
Sehon, S. (2016). Free Will and Action Explanation: A Non-Causal, Compatibilist Account. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sellars, W. (1956). Empiricism and the philosophy of mind. Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 1: 253–329.
Sellars, W. (1963). Science, Perception and Reality. Atascadero, CA: Ridgeview Publishing Company.
Sellars, W. (1975). Autobiographical reflections (February 1973). In Castañeda, H.-N. (Ed.), Action, Knowledge, and Reality: Studies in Honor of Wilfrid Sellars. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill.
Sepielli, A. (forthcoming). Subjective and objective reasons. In Star, D. (Ed.), Oxford Handbook of Reasons and Normativity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Setiya, K. (2007). Reasons without Rationalism. Princeton, NJ, and Oxford: Princeton University Press.
Setiya, K. (2014). What is a reason to act? Philosophical Studies, 167: 221–235.
Shope, R. (1983). The Analysis of Knowing: A Decade of Research. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Silins, N. (2005). Deception and evidence. Philosophical Perspectives, 19: 375–404.
Simchen, O. (2004). On the impossibility of nonactual epistemic possibilities. The Journal of Philosophy, 101(10): 527–554.
Simons, M., Beaver, D., Roberts, C., and Tonhauser, J. (forthcoming). The Best Question: Explaining the Projection Behaviour of Factives. Discourse Processes.
Smith, M. (1992). Valuing: Desiring or believing? In Charles, D. and Lennon, K. (Eds.), Reduction, Explanation, and Realism (pp. 323–360). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Smith, M. (1994). The Moral Problem. Oxford: Blackwell.
Smith, M. (2003). Humeanism, psychologism, and the normative story. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 67: 460–467.
Smith, M. (2016). Between Probability and Certainty: What Justifies Belief. Oxford:Oxford University Press.
Smith, M. (forthcoming). The cost of treating knowledge as a mental state. In Carter, A., Gordon, E., and Jarvis, B. (Eds.), Knowledge-First Approaches in Epistemology and Mind. Oxford University Press.
Smithies, D. (2011). The normative role of knowledge. Noûs, 46: 265–288.
Snowdon, P. (1980/1). Perception, vision and causation. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 81: 175–192. Sosa, E. (1991). Knowledge in Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sosa, E. (1999). How to defeat opposition to Moore. Philosophical Perspectives, 13: 141–153.
Stanley, J. (2005). Knowledge and Practical Interests. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Steglich-Petersen, A. (2013). Truth as the aim of justification. In Chan, T. (Ed.), The Aim of Belief (pp. 204–226). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Stevenson, L. (2002). Six levels of mentality. Philosophical Explorations, 5: 105–124.
Stokke, A. (2013). Protagonist projection. Mind & Language, 28: 204–232.
Sutton, J. (2007). Without Justification. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Swanson, E. (2010). Lessons from the context sensitivity of causal talk. The Journal of Philosophy, 107: 221–242.
Titelbaum, M. (2015) Rationality’s fixed point (or: in defense of right reason). In Szabó Gendler, T. and Hawthorne, J. (Eds.), Oxford Studies in Epistemology. Vol. 5 (pp. 253–294) Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Tucker, C. (2010). Why open-minded people should endorse dogmatism. Philosophical Perspectives, 24: 529–545.
Turri, J. (2009). The ontology of epistemic reasons. Noûs, 43(3): 490–512.
Turri, J. (2011). The express knowledge account of assertion. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 89: 37–45.
Turri, J. (2013). The test of truth: An experimental investigation of the norm of assertion. Cognition, 129(2): 279–291.
Turri, J. (2015a). The radicalism of truth-insensitive epistemology: truth’s profound effect on the evaluation of belief. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. Available at http://doi.org/10.1111/phpr.12218. Turri, J. (2015b). Evidence of factive norms of belief and decision. Synthese, 192(12): 4009–4030.
Turri, J. (2015c). Knowledge and the norm of assertion: A simple test. Synthese, 192(2): 385–392.
Turri, J. (2015d). Knowledge, certainty, and assertion. Philosophical Psychology, 29(2): 293–299.
Turri, J. (2016a). How to do better: Toward normalizing experimentation in epistemology. In Nado, J. (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Philosophy and Philosophical Methodology (pp. 35–51). London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Turri, J. (2016b). Knowledge and assertion in ‘Gettier’ cases. Philosophical Psychology, 29(5): 759–775.
Turri, J. (2016c). Vision, knowledge, and assertion. Consciousness and Cognition, 41(C): 41–49.
Turri, J. (2016d). Knowledge and the Norm of Assertion: An Essay in Philosophical Science. Cambridge: Open Book Publishers.
Turri, J. (2016e). The radicalism of truth‐insensitive epistemology: Truth’s profound effect on the evaluation of belief. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 93(2): 348–367.
Turri, J. (in press). The distinctive ‘should’ of assertability. Philosophical Psychology.
Turri, J. (under review). Knowledge Attributions and Lottery Cases: A Review and New Evidence. University of Waterloo.
Turri, J. and Blouw, P. (2015). Excuse validation: A study in rule-breaking. Philosophical Studies, 172(3): 615–634.
Turri, J. and Buckwalter, W. (in press). Descartes’s schism, Locke’s reunion: Completing the pragmatic turn in epistemology. American Philosophical Quarterly, 54(1): 25–46.
Turri, J., Friedman, O., and Keefner, A. (2017). Knowledge central: A central role for knowledge attributions in social evaluations. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 70(3): 504–515.
Unger, P. (1975). Ignorance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Van Cleve, J. (1985). Epistemic supervenience and the circle of belief. The Monist, 68(1): 90–104.
Van Cleve, J. (1999). Reid on the first principles of common sense. Reid Studies, 3(1): 3–30.
van Fraassen, B. (1980). The Scientific Image. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Vogel, J. (1990). Cartesian skepticism and inference to the best explanation. Journal of Philosophy, 87: 658–666.
Wallace, R. J. (2003). Explanation, deliberation, and reasons. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 67: 429–435.
Way, J. and Whiting, D. (2016). If you justifiably believe that you ought to φ, you ought to φ. Philosophical Studies, 173(7): 1873–1895.
Weatherson, B. (2012). Knowledge, bets, and interests. In Brown, J. and Gerken, M. (Eds.), Knowledge Ascriptions (pp. 75–103). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wedgwood, R. (2002). Internalism explained. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 65(2): 349–369.
Wedgwood, R. (2013a). Akrasia and uncertainty. Organon F, 20: 484–506.
Wedgwood, R. (2013b). The right thing to believe. In Chan, T. (Ed.), The Aim of Belief (pp. 123–139). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wedgwood, R. (2017). The Value of Rationality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wedgwood, R. (MS). Internalism Re-explained.
White, R. (2014). What is my evidence that here is a hand? In Dodd, D. and Zardini, E. (Eds.), Scepticism and Perceptual Justification (pp. 298–321). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Whiting, D. (2013). Nothing but the truth: On the norms and aims of belief. In Chan, T. (Ed.), The Aim of Belief (pp. 184–203). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Williams, B. A. O. (1981). Internal and external reasons. Moral Luck. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Williamson, T. (2000). Knowledge and Its Limits. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Williamson, T. (2011). Knowledge first epistemology. In Bernecker, S. and Pritchard, D. (Eds.), The Routledge Companion to Epistemology (pp. 208–218). New York, NY: Routledge.
Williamson, T. (forthcoming a). Justifications, excuses, and sceptical scenarios. In Dorsch, F. and Dutant, J. (Eds.), The New Evil Demon. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Williamson, T. (forthcoming b). Acting on knowledge. In Carter, J. A., Gordon, E., and Jarvis, B. (Eds.), Knowledge-First. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wilson, J. C. (1926). Statement and Inference. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Wittgenstein, L. (1969). On Certainty. (Anscombe, G. E. and von Wright, G. H., Eds.; Paul, D. and Anscombe, G. E., Trans.) Oxford: Blackwell.
Worsnip, A. (2015). Belief, credence, and the preface paradox. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 94: 549–562.
Wright, J. C. (2010). On intuitional stability: The clear, the strong, and the paradigmatic. Cognition, 115(3): 419–503.
Yablo, S. (1996). How in the world? In Hill, C. (Ed.), Philosophical Topics, 24(1): 255–287.
Zalabardo, J. (2015). Epistemic disjunctivism and the evidential problem. Analysis, 75: 615–627.
Zardini, E. (2013). Luminosity and vagueness. Dialectica, 66: 375–410.
Zimmerman, M. (2008). Living with Uncertainty: The Moral Significance of Ignorance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
