ao link
Twitter
Facebook
Linked In
Twitter
Facebook
Linked In

You are viewing 1 of your 1 free articles

Council evicts family from temporary accommodation for failing to attend viewing 180 miles away

A London council has blamed government benefit restrictions for its decision to evict a family with three children from temporary accommodation after they were unable to attend a viewing for a home more than 180 miles away in Stoke-on-Trent.

Linked InTwitterFacebookeCard
The London-based family were offered a home in Stoke-on-Trent (picture: Getty)
The London-based family were offered a home in Stoke-on-Trent (picture: Getty)
Sharelines

A London council has blamed benefit restrictions for its decision to evict a family with three children from temporary accommodation after they were unable to attend a viewing for a home more than 180 miles away in Stoke-on-Trent #UKhousing

Waltham Forest Council stated that it had a “duty to taxpayers” over the decision to end the temporary accommodation it was providing for the family in south London borough Lewisham for a family with three children – one aged 10 and two aged three.

It added that the government’s benefit caps meant it had to consider the financial circumstances of households to ensure the housing being offered was affordable and that the current Local Housing Allowance (LHA) freeze made it “very challenging” to find accommodation in London.

The council had a duty to house the family, but in June it issued a private sector discharge offer for a home in Stoke-on-Trent.

But the family said they were unable to attend a viewing because the father had just started a new job in London.

Shortly after the viewing date, the council notified the family that they must leave their temporary accommodation.

With support from Housing Action Southwark and Lambeth (HASL), the family are submitting a legal challenge to the decision.

Despite an application for “accommodation pending review”, the council terminated the temporary accommodation arrangement on 20 July.

The review is being conducted under section 202 of the Housing Act 1996, with a decision expected on 16 August.

According to HASL, it is common for London councils to provide accommodation pending the outcome of a review, however that has not occurred in this case.


READ MORE

Councils given £13m to help prison leavers find long-term accommodationCouncils given £13m to help prison leavers find long-term accommodation
Evictions by private landlords outstrip social housing sector for first time during pandemicEvictions by private landlords outstrip social housing sector for first time during pandemic
Housing associations make ‘no eviction’ pledge permanent for tenants that co-operate with landlordsHousing associations make ‘no eviction’ pledge permanent for tenants that co-operate with landlords
Hundreds of thousands face eviction as ban comes to an endHundreds of thousands face eviction as ban comes to an end
Ministers must maintain ‘Everyone In’ spending to end rough sleeping by 2024, urges Kerslake CommissionMinisters must maintain ‘Everyone In’ spending to end rough sleeping by 2024, urges Kerslake Commission

Liz Wyatt from HASL said: “There is no justification for evicting this young family with one day’s notice in the middle of an extreme heatwave and soaring COVID-19 cases.

“We are deeply concerned and horrified by Waltham Forest Council’s treatment of this vulnerable family and their decision to pursue this harmful eviction.

“Why won’t Waltham Forest Council simply do the right thing and leave this family in their temporary accommodation where they are settled?”

Commenting on the case, Louise Mitchell, cabinet member for housing and homelessness prevention at Waltham Forest Council, said: “Waltham Forest Council works hard to provide accommodation for residents who request assistance.

“Our preference is to house every household locally. However, demand for housing in London far outstrips supply and we regret that it is not always possible to place people in the borough.

“Alongside our duty to offer accommodation to those in need, we also have a duty to make sure council taxpayers’ money is being used in a sustainable and reasonable way and that we can continue to provide the essential day-to-day services on which all our residents rely.

“We must follow the government’s benefits cap policy when we make any offer of accommodation and we must consider the financial circumstances of each household to ensure the offer is affordable and sustainable for them. “The freeze on the rent we can pay under the Local Housing Allowance makes it very challenging to find affordable accommodation in London. We cannot comment in more detail on individual cases.”

In a wave of welfare announcements during the early days of the pandemic, Rishi Sunak announced that the government would be ending a four-year freeze on LHA rates and restoring them to cover the cheapest third of rents within the government’s ‘broad rental market areas’.

However, it was revealed in last November’s Spending Review that LHA rates would once again be frozen from April 2021, with the Office of Budget Responsibility stating that this would see “rents falling back below the 30th percentile of local rents over time” as rents continue to increase.

A government spokesperson said: “We’ve taken unprecedented action to protect renters during this pandemic, including increasing Local Housing Allowance rates significantly in 2020/21, which has boosted support by almost £1bn, benefiting more than one million households by £600 on average over the year.

“We are maintaining rates at the same cash level in 2021/22, meaning support for private renters is still substantially higher than it was before the pandemic.”

Sign up for our homelessness bulletin

Sign up for our homelessness bulletin
Linked InTwitterFacebookeCard
Add New Comment
You must be logged in to comment.
By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to the use of cookies. Browsing is anonymised until you sign up. Click for more info.
Cookie Settings