Table 1 A manifesto for reproducible science.

From: A manifesto for reproducible science

Theme

Proposal

Examples of initiatives/potential solutions (extent of current adoption)

Stakeholder(s)

Methods

Protecting against cognitive biases

All of the initiatives listed below (* to ****)

Blinding (**)

J, F

Improving methodological training

Rigorous training in statistics and research methods for future researchers (*)

Rigorous continuing education in statistics and methods for researchers (*)

I, F

Independent methodological support

Involvement of methodologists in research (**)

Independent oversight (*)

F

Collaboration and team science

Multi-site studies/distributed data collection (*)

Team-science consortia (*)

I, F

Reporting and dissemination

Promoting study pre-registration

Registered Reports (*)

Open Science Framework (*)

J, F

Improving the quality of reporting

Use of reporting checklists (**)

Protocol checklists (*)

J

Protecting against conflicts of interest

Disclosure of conflicts of interest (***)

Exclusion/containment of financial and non-financial conflicts of interest (*)

J

Reproducibility

Encouraging transparency and open science

Open data, materials, software and so on (* to **)

Pre-registration (**** for clinical trials, * for other studies)

J, F, R

Evaluation

Diversifying peer review

Preprints (* in biomedical/behavioural sciences, **** in physical sciences)

Pre- and post-publication peer review, for example, Publons, PubMed Commons (*)

J

Incentives

Rewarding open and reproducible practices

Badges (*)

Registered Reports (*)

Transparency and Openness Promotion guidelines (*)

Funding replication studies (*)

Open science practices in hiring and promotion (*)

J, I, F

  1. Estimated extent of current adoption: *, <5%; **, 5-30%; ***, 30-60%; ****, >60%. Abbreviations for key stakeholders: J, journals/publishers; F, funders; I, institutions; R, regulators.